One graph+vector record over humanity's sacred texts — and, in time, its deep history and its futures. When the sources disagree, it doesn't pick a side. It shows you both.
Same corpus underneath — different doors. Walk a story, compare a topic, trace where a verse came from, or see history on a map.
You choose a road through time — a book, not a search box.
Five thousand years of scripture as one chronological path with forks. Every word quoted verbatim; when traditions quarrel, both citations stay. Print-first at A3.
You pick a topic — every tradition answers with a real verse.
Searchable concordance of shared concepts, numbers, and laws. Side-by-side cards per tradition; disagreements stay visible. No story path — a lookup desk.
Same concordance as above, plus an engraving plate per topic.
You read the Christian Bible beside what it may draw on.
World English Bible (public domain) down its own spine — older Near-Eastern roots on one side, parallels in unrelated religions on the other. Each link graded firm / mid / loose.
You fly a WebGL timeline — when traditions branch, borrow, or split.
Interactive map of convergence and divergence across millennia. Not a reader: a history instrument.
Lucid Religion is the shared engine under every door above — not another reader. Pure-stdlib, training-free, deterministic. It never generates prose — it quotes the corpus or refuses. Ask “How many gods are there?” and it will not answer as fact:
“Hear, O Israel: the LORD our God, the LORD is one.” — Deuteronomy 6:4
“He is Allah, the One.” — Qur'an 112:1
“To Indra and Agni and Varuna, the gods…” — Rig Veda
→ The corpus is the world's religions, and they disagree. Both citations stand. That refusal is the truest thing it can say.