Master Kill Switch Registry
Master Kill Switch Registry The 420 Code v5.26 — July 2026
561 kill switches across The 420 Code
277 across 43 Artist’s Proofs · 28 across the Five Doors volumes · 256 across the Ø Models series
12 closed · 1 conditionally closed · 2 addressed · 1 derived · 545 live · 6 non-negotiable
Counted as distinct switches — the same basis the bound notebooks use.
Every claim is stated. Every kill switch is published. Every experiment is specified.
Published for free forever · the420code.org
v5.26 (July 2026): KS-BAR.9 admitted — the Crossing (Being After Religion); Section II 27 → 28, live 544 → 545, total 561. KS-BAR.1 sharpened; spine unchanged. KS-RC.8 re-homed to KS-ID.1 / D-ID.1 — the last stale AP29 attribution in Section II. No other IDs, statuses, or tallies changed.
Contents Closed Switches — Complete List ......................................................... 5 Section I — Physics Switches ................................................................. 8 AP01 — The Actualization State ....................................................................8 AP02 — The Operator...................................................................................... 10 AP03 — The Ratio ...............................................................................................11 AP04 — The Loop Hypothesis...................................................................... 12 AP05 — The Break (Axiom → Structure)................................................. 12 AP06 — The Leakage Constant ................................................................... 13 AP07 — The Record Measure (Force-Strength) ...................................14 AP08 — The Identity (Einstein Field Equations) ................................. 15 AP09 — The Break — Empty Set (Quantum Mechanics) ................. 15 AP10 — The Dimension ................................................................................... 16 AP11 — The Spin .................................................................................................. 16 AP12 — The Limit................................................................................................ 17 AP13 — The Grain ............................................................................................... 17 AP14 — The Correction (Physics) ................................................................18 AP15 — The Connection ..................................................................................18 AP16 — The Break (Electroweak)................................................................. 19 AP17 — The Room .............................................................................................. 19 AP18 — The Floor............................................................................................... 20 AP19 — The Direction ...................................................................................... 20 AP20 — The Proof .............................................................................................. 21 AP21 — The Web ................................................................................................. 21 AP22 — The Ledger (Antimatter) ............................................................... 22 AP23 — The Single Record ........................................................................... 22 AP24 — The Residual ...................................................................................... 23 AP25 — The Measure....................................................................................... 23 AP26 — The Surplus ......................................................................................... 24 AP27 — The Harmonics .................................................................................. 24 AP28 — The Constant (Gravity)................................................................... 25 AP29 — The Actualization Proof ................................................................ 25 AP30 — The Resistance (Mass) .................................................................. 26 AP31 — The Alignment .................................................................................... 27 AP32 — The Correction (Ethics) ................................................................. 28 AP33 — The Boundary ..................................................................................... 28
AP34 — The Inversion..................................................................................... 29 AP35 — The Ledger (Economics) ..............................................................30 AP36 — The Feed ..............................................................................................30 AP37 — The First Boundary ........................................................................... 31 AP38 — The Exit................................................................................................. 32 AP39 — The Scaffold ....................................................................................... 32 AP40 — The Irrational .................................................................................... 33 AP41 — The Loop............................................................................................... 33 AP42 — The Clock ............................................................................................. 34 AP43 — The Gravity of Possibilities ......................................................... 35 Section II — Philosophy Switches ......................................................37 Being After Religion — The Front Door ................................................... 37 Antichristos — The Sacred Door ................................................................ 42 The Relationship Corridor — The Personal Door................................ 45 The Interior — The Operational Door ...................................................... 47 The Illusion of the Other — The Gentle Door.......................................48 Section II Summary .........................................................................................48 Section III — Ø Models Series Switches......................................... 49 Ø Predictions — The Falsifiable Physics-Facing Volume ............... 49 Ø Dissolutions — Twelve Classical Problems Structurally Resolved ................................................................................................................. 52 Ø Resolutions — Thirteen Further Problems ........................................ 58 Ø Applications — The Architecture-B Civilisational Volume ........ 65 Ø Horizons — The Closing Volume ........................................................... 72 Section III Summary ....................................................................................... 79 The 420 Code — Total ............................................................................ 80
Closed Switches — Complete List Twelve switches have been formally discharged. Additionally: 1 conditionally closed (KS-Q.1), 2 addressed (KS-46B, KS-46C). KS46B was reclassified from CLOSED to ADDRESSED in v5.7 — Sewell (1982) discharges its bifurcation tension (Gap 5) but not the full AQFT bridge, which retains SMALL gaps; the body of work does not file a sub-tension closure as a full closure.
Statuses. LIVE — the claim stands exposed to its stated test; the dash qualifier marks either the character of the test (HARD, STRUCTURAL, EMPIRICAL, STAGED, DEPENDENT) or the standing of the switch within the live set. OPEN DEBT (the DEBT qualifier) — the obligation is named and owed; no discharging argument is yet on file. NON-NEGOTIABLE — constitutive of the architecture; firing it ends the work rather than amending it. MASTER — as a counted status, designates the governing switch of a standalone volume (currently one: KS‑AC.6); chapters of bound notebooks may name a chapter-master in their own registers and row descriptions (currently KS‑38.8 and KS‑39.1), and chapter-masters are not counted in the global master tally. CRITICAL — marks a switch whose firing damages the body of work’s standing as a whole, beyond its origin paper; carried as a row marker within the live set (current instance: KS‑39.5). CLOSED — the falsification condition is discharged within the work; a closure resting on a live obligation names that contingency on its row (the contingent-closure convention, v5.14). COND. CLOSED — discharged subject to a named in-work condition, cited on the row. ADDRESSED — the substantive argument is on file and the remaining gaps are named on the row; the switch is not closed. DERIVED — established by derivation conditional on a named in-work dependency, stated at its origin (the single current instance: KS-46A, AP22, conditional on AP17); it closes if and when the fences of the dependency hold. OPEN DEBT, NON-NEGOTIABLE, MASTER, and CRITICAL switches are counted within the live total.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑Q.6 σ ↔ complex conjugation. ℂ CLOSED AP09 has exactly two field automorphisms fixing ℝ pointwise.
KS‑7 Embedding Hypothesis (EH). CLOSED AP20 Central conditional → theorem. KS‑P.4 Quantum-Record Alignment CLOSED AP20 (QRA). Quantum states ARE pre-state records.
KS‑2c / N = 3 spatial dimensions. Four CLOSED AP10 KS‑I.6 axioms → four faces. Contingent on KS-D.3.
KS‑15 / Axiom-to-dimension CLOSED AP10 KS‑D.2 assignment. R uniquely irreversible. Contingent on KS- D.4.
KS‑16 Completeness of {S, B, R, C}. CLOSED AP10 Fifth DOF = Hilbert space. Contingent on KS-P.1 (reciprocal of its formalisation obligation).
KS‑Q.8 / ℏ identification. Stone’s CLOSED AP12 KS‑L.1 theorem + Axiom B forcing argument. KS‑28 Phase-group uniqueness (U(1)). CLOSED AP15 Mathematical theorem. KS‑29 Maxwell uniqueness. Unique CLOSED AP15 dim-4 gaugeinvariant local action.
KS‑45.2 Was KS-47(AP18). Dipole CLOSED AP18 topology. Poincaré–Hopf.
KS‑49a Was KS-49(AP23). Hidden CLOSED AP23 variables. Bell + Axiom R. KS‑42 Tension field equation from CLOSED AP17 {S,B,R,C}. Rosin V7. KS‑Q.1 Born rule derivation. COND. CLOSED AP09 Conditional on KS‑Q.7.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑46B AQFT bridge. Bifurcation ADDRESSED AP22 tension (Gap 5) discharged via Sewell 1982; full bridge (Gap 1 restatement, vacuum- uniqueness W3) carries SMALL gaps.
KS‑46C Operator identification (σ̂=J). ADDRESSED AP22 Anti-linearity proof exhibited.
Section I — Physics Switches 277 kill switches across 43 Artist’s Proofs, counted as distinct switches — 281 table rows, of which 4 are cross-listings of single switches: the 278 rows verified in the June 2026 full count (including KS-31.9b, admitted in v5.12) plus KS-P.5, admitted in v5.13, KS-D.4, admitted in v5.14, and KSCOUP.1, admitted in v5.23. The version-by-version lineage is preserved in the Appendix. The formal derivation chain: every kill switch here is tied to an axiom-forced result or a closure condition for a derived quantity.
AP01 — The Actualization State 24 kill switches. KS-V.1 is the global kill switch. Renumbered from KS-50–73 to KS-V.1–V.24 per v3.0 recommendation. The bound Notebook I (v3) binds the KS-V.1–V.24 register directly, with the legacy in-paper falsifier codes (F0–F3, G1–G3, B2, FC1–FC5, FD0–FD4.4b) annotated at first mention and attached to the formal blocks in the body of the Papers; this table is the mapping.
Paper A — Actualization State KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑V.1 Operational invariance of AS LIVE — AP01 A (F0). GLOBAL KILL SWITCH. EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.2 Pointer-basis targeting (F1). LIVE — AP01 A EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.3 Born violation (F2). LIVE — AP01 A EMPIRICAL KS‑V.4 Context dependence (F3). LIVE — AP01 A EMPIRICAL
Paper B — Selection KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑V.5 Selection rate exceeds LIVE — AP01 B gravitational bound (G1). EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.6 Selection in gravitationally LIVE — AP01 B degenerate regime (G2). EMPIRICAL
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑V.7 Non-gravitational rate scaling LIVE — AP01 B (G3). EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.8 Pre-irreversibility selection (B2). LIVE — AP01 B EMPIRICAL
Paper C — Agency KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑V.9 Agency increase without control LIVE — AP01 C (FC1). EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.10 Irreversible loss reversed (FC2). LIVE — AP01 C EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.11 Stable control past no-return LIVE — AP01 C surface (FC3). EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.12 Free lunch (FC4). LIVE — AP01 C EMPIRICAL KS‑V.13 Resurrection (FC5). LIVE — AP01 C EMPIRICAL
Paper D — Coupled Viability KS ID Description Status Origin KS‑V.14 Multi-agent persistence LIVE — AP01 D violation (FD0). EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.15 No free survival (FD1). LIVE — AP01 D EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.16 Additivity under coupling LIVE — AP01 D (FD2.1). EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.17 Impedance-independent LIVE — AP01 D efficiency (FD2.2). EMPIRICAL KS‑V.18 Anti-resonant optimality LIVE — AP01 D (FD2.3). EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.19 Cascade non-propagation LIVE — AP01 D (FD3.3). EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.20 Order indistinguishable from LIVE — AP01 D noise (FD4). EMPIRICAL
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑V.21 Persistent violators (FD4.2). LIVE — AP01 D EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.22 Hierarchy inversion (FD4.3). LIVE — AP01 D EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.23 Cooperation nonexistence LIVE — AP01 D (FD4.4a). EMPIRICAL
KS‑V.24 Deterrence exit (FD4.4b). LIVE — AP01 D EMPIRICAL
AP02 — The Operator 4 kill switches. KS-O.1–O.3 plus KS-COUP.1 (net-positive containment, Theorem VI.2).
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑O.1 Drift-discipline duality. LIVE — AP02 EMPIRICAL KS‑O.2 Capacity horizon. LIVE — AP02 EMPIRICAL
KS‑O.3 Exit optimality. LIVE — AP02 EMPIRICAL
KS‑COUP.1 Net-positive containment. LIVE — AP02 Persistent set confined to the STRUCTURAL net-positive class; net-negative (conditional) / parasitic / defecting configurations reach the no- return surface. (Theorem VI.2, DERIVED-CONDITIONAL.)
AP03 — The Ratio 6 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑R.1 Independent variability of LIVE — AP03 dimensionless couplings. EMPIRICAL
KS‑R.2 Non-binary origin. Universe LIVE — AP03 requires >2 fundamental EMPIRICAL sectors. KS‑R.3 Dark ratio independence. LIVE — AP03 EMPIRICAL
KS‑R.4 Horizon inequivalence. LIVE — HARD AP03
KS‑R.5 Planck scale mismatch. LIVE — AP03 EMPIRICAL
KS‑R.6 Scaling violation. AP03’s G = SUPERSEDED AS AP03 κ/(εΛ²) (c/G ∝ ε) is a substrate- VALUE — see level scaling with κ, Λ free; AP28 SUPERSEDED AS THE VALUE by AP28, which derives G = α_em²¹(1+1/π)ℏc/m_e² parameter-free (G ∝ ε²¹, 0.69%). The two operate at different architectural levels (substrate condensate vs. Mode-0 channel count) and are reconciled, not in conflict. AP03 text updated (status note + Theorem E-G); the c/G≈10³⁸ mislabel corrected to the gravitational hierarchy ke²/(G·m_e²)≈10⁴²–10⁴³; the last residual 10³⁸ locus (the §4 conjugacy note) corrected and the in-paper Test rescoped to the substrate level (fixed κ, Λ) in the v5.14 Notebook II pass.
AP04 — The Loop Hypothesis 9 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑L0.1 Structural identity disproved. No LIVE — HARD AP04 BH→FRW mapping.
KS‑L0.2 No singularity resolution. LIVE — HARD AP04 Terminal singularity with no extension. KS‑L0.3 Information loss. BH LIVE — AP04 evaporation fundamentally non- EMPIRICAL unitary. KS‑L0.4 Proton decay observed. LIVE — AP04 EMPIRICAL
KS‑L0.5 GSL violated. ΔS_gen < 0 LIVE — AP04 demonstrated. EMPIRICAL
KS‑L0.6 Actualisation without LIVE — AP04 awareness. GRW confirmed. EMPIRICAL KS‑L0.7 Fermions unnecessary. LIVE — HARD AP04 Bosonic-only reproduces identity. KS‑L0.8 Anisotropy irreconcilable. LIVE — HARD AP04 Sharpest obstacle.
KS‑L0.9 CMB mismatch. ε·h cannot LIVE — AP04 reproduce P_ℛ(k). EMPIRICAL
AP05 — The Break (Axiom → Structure) 5 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin KS‑B.0 Universal: independent LIVE — HARD AP05 specifications.
KS‑B.1 Bounce superior. LIVE — AP05 EMPIRICAL
KS‑B.2 Spectrum mismatch (staged). LIVE — STAGED AP05 Pending B-JP.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑B.3 No junction solution. Sharpest LIVE — HARD AP05 test.
KS‑B.4 Chain break. Undeclared LIVE — HARD AP05 assumption in B0–B-6.
AP06 — The Leakage Constant 7 kill switches. 0 closed. Identifiers use the KS-L.x scheme, matching the locked AP06 document. NOTE — label collision: AP12 (The Limit) also uses KS-L.1–L.4 for different switches. The two are disambiguated by the Origin column: KS-L.x (AP06) are the Leakage switches below; KS-L.x (AP12) are the Limit switches in the AP12 entry. Any external cross-reference to a KSL.x switch MUST carry its origin, e.g. “KS-L.1 (AP06)” vs “KS-L.1 (AP12)”. (Renaming was considered; both papers are locked with the KS-L.x labels in-text, so disambiguation-by-origin is preferred over churning 62+ indocument references.) The Embedding Hypothesis (EH) is owned and CLOSED by AP20 (KS-7 in the AP20 entry); AP06 opens kill switches but closes none of its own. The α_em ≈ 1/137 “one measured input” concern is owned by AP24 (KS-35/KS-36, self-consistency), not duplicated here.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑L.1 Perfect absorber. η > 0 LIVE — AP06 whenever c and the relevant EMPIRICAL coupling are finite (analysed channels). Load-bearing for Theorem 3.1. Label collision with AP12’s KS-L.1 — two distinct switches, disambiguated by origin. KS‑L.2 Sufficiency failure within the LIVE — AP06 AP06 near-perfect-absorber EMPIRICAL class. Load-bearing for Theorem 3.1 (scoped).
KS‑L.3 Epsilon identification (ε ≡ η). LIVE — AP06 Dependent — falls if KS-L.1 or DEPENDENT KS-L.2 fires.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑L.4 Landauer violation. Information LIVE — AP06 erasure below k_B T ln 2 per bit. EMPIRICAL Targets §4 synthesis.
KS‑L.5 No shared structural LIVE — HARD AP06 parameterisation. Non-load- bearing; targets §3.2 heuristic. KS‑L.6 G independent of c. Structurally LIVE — HARD AP06 constrained by AP20’s forcing proof.
KS‑L.7 Poisson derivation: completed LIVE — HARD AP06 G coefficient depends on c through ε. Partially reduced by AP43 §7.
AP07 — The Record Measure (Force-Strength) 5 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑RM.1 EM uniqueness as writer. LIVE — AP07 EMPIRICAL
KS‑RM.2 Non-triviality of the record LIVE — HARD AP07 measure. KS‑RM.3 Tuning of α and G. LIVE — AP07 EMPIRICAL KS‑RM.4 Scale-specificity of the LIVE — AP07 inversion. EMPIRICAL
KS‑RM.5 Configurable register criterion. LIVE — AP07 EMPIRICAL
AP08 — The Identity (Einstein Field Equations) 8 kill switches. 1 closed.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑I.1 Axiom-to-Poisson chain. LIVE — HARD AP08
KS‑I.2 Lovelock chain. LIVE — HARD AP08
KS‑I.3 Coefficient identification. LIVE — HARD AP08
KS‑I.4 κ structural inaccessibility. LIVE — HARD AP08
KS‑I.5 Curvature-record identity. LIVE — AP08 EMPIRICAL
KS‑I.6 N = 3. Same switch as KS-2c in CLOSED AP08→AP10 AP10 — counted once; contingent on KS-D.3. KS‑I.7 Cosmological constant. LIVE — AP08 EMPIRICAL
KS‑I.8 Axiom R → source conservation LIVE — HARD AP08 bridge.
AP09 — The Break — Empty Set (Quantum Mechanics) 10 kill switches. 2 closed. 1 conditionally closed.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑Q.1 Born rule derivation. COND. CLOSED AP09 Conditional on KS-Q.7.
KS‑Q.2 Born rule empirically. LIVE — AP09 EMPIRICAL
KS‑Q.3 No-signalling (entanglement). LIVE — AP09 EMPIRICAL
KS‑Q.4 Complex uniqueness. LIVE — HARD AP09
KS‑Q.5 Loop identification (physical). LIVE — HARD AP09
KS‑Q.6 σ ↔ complex conjugation. CLOSED AP09
KS‑Q.7 Hilbert space bridge LIVE — HARD AP09 construction.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑Q.8 ℏ identification. Same switch as CLOSED AP09→AP12 KS-L.1 in AP12 — counted once.
KS‑Q.9 Defragmentation exclusion. LIVE — HARD AP09
KS‑Q.10 Pre-state ontological grounding. LIVE — HARD AP09
AP10 — The Dimension 6 kill switches. 3 closed.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑2c N = 3 spatial dimensions. CLOSED AP10 Contingent on KS-D.3.
KS‑15/D.2 Axiom-to-dimension CLOSED AP10 assignment uniqueness. Contingent on KS-D.4.
KS‑16 Fifth axiom / completeness of CLOSED AP10 {S,B,R,C}. Contingent on KS-P.1.
KS‑D.1 Six-face count. LIVE — AP10 STRUCTURAL KS‑D.3 One axiom, one face. LIVE — AP10 STRUCTURAL
KS‑D.4 Signature formalisation. LIVE — AP10 Embedded metric pseudo- STRUCTURAL Riemannian (−, +, +, +); §4 structural argument carried; formal derivation open.
AP11 — The Spin 3 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑S.1 ℤ₂ identification with π₁(SO(3)). LIVE — HARD AP11
KS‑S.2 Minimum spin selection. LIVE — HARD AP11
KS‑S.3 Exchange–involution bridge. LIVE — HARD AP11
AP12 — The Limit 4 kill switches. 1 closed. Identifiers use the KS-L.x scheme, matching the locked AP12 document. NOTE — label collision: AP06 (The Leakage Constant) also uses KS-L.x labels for different switches; disambiguated by the Origin column. Any external cross-reference to a KS-L.x switch MUST carry its origin, e.g. “KS-L.1 (AP12)” vs “KS-L.1 (AP06)”.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑L.1 ℏ identification (was KS-Q.8). CLOSED AP12 Label collision with AP06’s KS- L.1 — two distinct switches, disambiguated by origin.
KS‑L.2 Commutation corrections. LIVE — AP12 EMPIRICAL
KS‑L.3 Mandelstam-Tamm. LIVE — AP12 EMPIRICAL KS‑L.4 Dimensionless parameter in ℏ LIVE — HARD AP12 forcing.
AP13 — The Grain 3 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑22 Anomalous coherence LIVE — AP13 persistence. EMPIRICAL
KS‑23 Quantum eraser record LIVE — AP13 destruction. EMPIRICAL
KS‑24 Quantum sector completeness. LIVE — HARD AP13
AP14 — The Correction (Physics) 4 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑21 Commutation corrections at LIVE — AP14 Planck scale. EMPIRICAL
KS‑25 One-loop amplitude/coefficient LIVE — AP14 finiteness. EMPIRICAL
KS‑26 Monoid combinatorics at one LIVE — HARD AP14 loop.
KS‑27 Higher-loop finiteness. LIVE — AP14 EMPIRICAL
AP15 — The Connection 5 kill switches. 2 closed.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑28 Phase-group uniqueness (U(1)). CLOSED AP15
KS‑29 Maxwell uniqueness. CLOSED AP15
KS‑30 Phase globality. LIVE — AP15 STRUCTURAL
KS‑31 Entanglement–connection LIVE — AP15 identification. Theorem 4 STRUCTURAL establishes the partition + ε- transfer; conserved-balance theorem held open.
KS‑4 α_em ≈ 1/137 (continued). One LIVE — HARD AP15 switch, cross-listed in AP15 and AP16 — counted once.
AP16 — The Break (Electroweak) 5 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑32 Electroweak breaking LIVE — AP16 mechanism. EMPIRICAL
KS-AP16.1 Scalar–fermion two-faces LIVE — AP16 reconciliation. Dynamical STRUCTURAL mechanism by which one ε presents both a spin-0 background (Higgs field) and a spin-½ localised excitation (electron) at different scales.
KS‑33 Sector distinction = weak LIVE — AP16 isospin. EMPIRICAL KS‑34 Non-derivability of α_em. LIVE — HARD AP16 Triggering = triumph.
KS‑4 α_em (continued). Cross-listed LIVE — HARD AP16 with AP15 — counted once.
AP17 — The Room 7 kill switches. 1 closed (v3.0).
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑3 Isotropic acceleration LIVE — AP17 (upgraded HARD → EMPIRICAL EMPIRICAL).
KS‑39 a₀ numerical value. 5.8% at H₀ LIVE — AP17 = 70 (<1% at H₀ = 74), EMPIRICAL sharpened by AP18.
KS‑40 Cluster dynamics. LIVE — AP17 EMPIRICAL
KS‑41 Structure formation. Hardest LIVE — AP17 test. EMPIRICAL KS‑42 Tension field equation from CLOSED AP17→V7 {S,B,R,C}.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑43 Interpolation function. LIVE — AP17 EMPIRICAL
KS‑44 Galaxies without central anchor. LIVE — AP17 EMPIRICAL
AP18 — The Floor 3 kill switches. 1 closed. Former KS-46/47 renumbered to KS-45.1/45.2 to resolve collision with AP22.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑45 2π geometric factor. LIVE — AP18 EMPIRICAL KS‑45.1 Hubble prediction. H₀ = 74.3 ± LIVE — AP18 1.2. EMPIRICAL
KS‑45.2 Dipole topology. Poincaré–Hopf. CLOSED AP18
AP19 — The Direction 3 kill switches. Former KS-48/49 renumbered to KS-48c/49b to resolve collision with AP23.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑48c Orientation = colour. LIVE — AP19 EMPIRICAL KS‑49b Confinement from isotropy. LIVE — AP19 EMPIRICAL
KS‑50 SU(3) from non-derivability. LIVE — HARD AP19
AP20 — The Proof 6 kill switches. 2 closed.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑7 EH (Embedding Hypothesis). CLOSED AP20
KS‑P.1 Completeness of the axiom set LIVE — HARD AP20 {S, B, R, C} (full formalisation obligation; carried at AP20 §4; KS-16’s sufficiency closure at AP10 is contingent on this obligation).
KS‑P.2 Minimality of the axiom set {S, LIVE — HARD AP20 B, R, C} (full formalisation obligation; carried at AP20 §4).
KS‑P.3 Record definition / forcing LIVE — HARD AP20 argument.
KS‑P.4 QRA (Quantum-Record CLOSED AP20 Alignment). KS‑P.5 Smoothness of the LIVE — AP20 Actualization State (the EMPIRICAL manifold identity).
AP21 — The Web 4 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑41 Structure formation (continued). LIVE — AP21 Cross-listed from AP17 — EMPIRICAL counted once.
KS‑51 Filament topology. LIVE — AP21 EMPIRICAL KS‑52 Primordial anchor sequence. LIVE — AP21 EMPIRICAL
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑54 Web connectivity (multiply- LIVE — AP21 connected network; junctions EMPIRICAL are Steiner 120° vertices). Label collision with AP23’s KS-54 — two distinct switches, disambiguated by origin; renumbering candidate KS-68 at next rebind.
AP22 — The Ledger (Antimatter) 5 kill switches. 0 closed. 2 addressed. 1 derived.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑46A Boundary identification. DERIVED AP22
KS‑46B AQFT bridge. Bifurcation ADDRESSED AP22 tension (Gap 5) discharged via Sewell 1982; full bridge retains SMALL gaps.
KS‑46C Operator identification (σ̂=J). ADDRESSED AP22
KS‑47 Global baryon number. ~10 LIVE — AP22 OOM tension. EMPIRICAL
KS‑53 Hawking evaporation products. LIVE — AP22 EMPIRICAL
AP23 — The Single Record 4 kill switches. 1 closed. Former KS-49 renumbered to KS-49a to resolve collision with AP19.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑48a Correlation timing. LIVE — AP23 EMPIRICAL KS‑48b No-signalling. LIVE — AP23 EMPIRICAL
KS‑49a Hidden variables. Bell + Axiom CLOSED AP23 R.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑54 Partial collapse. Label collision LIVE — AP23 with AP21’s KS-54 — two EMPIRICAL distinct switches, disambiguated by origin.
AP24 — The Residual 3 kill switches. Non-load-bearing.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑35 Self-consistency multiplicity. LIVE — HARD AP24
KS‑36 Self-consistency wrong value. LIVE — HARD AP24
KS‑37 Independent variation of LIVE — AP24 constants. EMPIRICAL
AP25 — The Measure 3 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin KS‑55 Gleason non-contextuality. LIVE — AP25 Structural ground of Proposition EMPIRICAL 2’s exhaustiveness fenced at KS-P.1.
KS‑56 Non-Born statistics. LIVE — AP25 EMPIRICAL KS‑57 Mixed-state actualisation. LIVE — AP25 EMPIRICAL
AP26 — The Surplus 3 kill switches. 1 open debt.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑58 Surplus form. LIVE — AP26 EMPIRICAL
KS‑59 Topological protection. LIVE — AP26 EMPIRICAL
KS‑60 Derived value mismatch. LIVE — DEBT AP26 Sharpest blade.
AP27 — The Harmonics 7 kill switches. 0 closed. 3 open debts.
KS ID Description Status Origin KS‑61 Internal state space existence. LIVE — AP27 STRUCTURAL
KS‑62 Gauge group overcounting. LIVE — AP27 STRUCTURAL KS‑63 Chiral coupling derivation. LIVE — AP27 Principal open problem; STRUCTURAL STRUCTURAL argument via Axiom R + CPT (AP22); formal coupling theorem not exhibited.
KS‑64 SU(2)_weak ≠ SU(2)_spin LIVE — AP27 conflation. STRUCTURAL
KS‑65 Hypercharge assignments. OPEN DEBT AP27
KS‑66 Generations. OPEN DEBT AP27
KS‑67 AP15/AP27 EWSB consistency. OPEN DEBT AP27
AP28 — The Constant (Gravity) 8 kill switches. G = α_em²¹ × (1 + 1/π) × ℏc/m_e². Discrepancy: 0.69%.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑R.7 G prediction. Must agree within LIVE — AP28 1%. EMPIRICAL
KS‑R.8 Channel count (exponent 21). LIVE — AP28 STRUCTURAL
KS‑R.8a Face completeness. LIVE — AP28 STRUCTURAL
KS‑R.8b Actualization scope. LIVE — AP28 STRUCTURAL KS‑R.8c Channel independence. LIVE — AP28 STRUCTURAL
KS‑R.8d Uniform coupling. LIVE — AP28 STRUCTURAL
KS‑R.9 Puncture geometry (1/π factor). LIVE — AP28 STRUCTURAL
KS‑R.10 Unification structure. LIVE — AP28 STRUCTURAL
AP29 — The Actualization Proof 8 kill switches (KS-AP29.1–.7 with .5a/.5b). The v4.2 additions KSAP29.8/.9/.10 under a non-existent “Step 8” are removed in v5.11; one-I → KS-ID.1, closed-loop → KS-41.7, α-rate retired. See v5.11 note.
KS ID Description Status Origin KS‑AP29.1 Actualisation as fundamental LIVE — AP29 state. STRUCTURAL
KS‑AP29.2 Awareness as capacity of LIVE — AP29 energy. STRUCTURAL
KS‑AP29.3 Big Bang as first actualisation. LIVE — AP29 STRUCTURAL KS‑AP29.4 Dark matter proportionality (21:1 LIVE — AP29 channel structure). EMPIRICAL
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑AP29.5a Energy conservation. LIVE — AP29 STRUCTURAL
KS‑AP29.5b Structural realism LIVE — AP29 (RETROACTIVE). STRUCTURAL
KS‑AP29.6 Dependency chain. LIVE — AP29 STRUCTURAL
KS‑AP29.7 Hard problem relocation. LIVE — AP29 STRUCTURAL
AP30 — The Resistance (Mass) 7 kill switches. m_p/m_e to 0.010 ppb (10 ppt).
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑30.1 Additivity formalisation. LIVE — AP30 STRUCTURAL KS‑30.2 Leakage isotropy. LIVE — AP30 EMPIRICAL
KS‑30.3 Higher-order terms. LIVE — AP30 STRUCTURAL
KS‑30.4 Alternative formula (proton- LIVE — AP30 / electron mass ratio). STRUCTURAL Predictions Part I
KS‑NPP.1 Two-component decomposition LIVE — AP30 / (neutron-proton mass). STRUCTURAL Predictions Part III
KS‑NPP.2 Sign of the difference (neutron- LIVE — AP30 / proton mass). STRUCTURAL Predictions Part III
KS‑NPP.3 Lattice QCD consistency LIVE — AP30 / (neutron-proton mass). STRUCTURAL Predictions Part III
AP31 — The Alignment 14 kill switches (10 main + 4 Addendum B). KS‑31.9b (the artificialconsciousness extension) is admitted in v5.12 — raised in Notebook VIII, Chapter 1, previously held for registry reconciliation.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑31.1 Awareness criterion. LIVE — AP31 STRUCTURAL
KS‑31.2 ε-optimality. LIVE — AP31 STRUCTURAL
KS‑31.3 Binary completeness. LIVE — AP31 STRUCTURAL
KS‑31.4 Record convergence. LIVE — AP31 STRUCTURAL KS‑31.5 Law-as-geometry. LIVE — AP31 EMPIRICAL
KS‑31.6 Quantum advantage. LIVE — AP31 EMPIRICAL
KS‑31.7 Civilizational test (MASTER). LIVE — AP31 EMPIRICAL
KS‑31.8 Self-modification. LIVE — AP31 STRUCTURAL
KS‑31.9 Adversarial records. LIVE — AP31 STRUCTURAL KS‑31.9b Artificial-consciousness LIVE — AP31 extension. Sits below the STRUCTURAL firewall with KS-31.6; its failure leaves the core architecture intact. Admitted v5.12 (raised in Notebook VIII, Ch. 1). KS‑31.B1 Training data novelty LIVE — AP31 (Addendum B). EMPIRICAL
KS‑31.B2 Counter-test replicability LIVE — AP31 (Addendum B). EMPIRICAL
KS‑31.B3 Pattern-matching sufficiency LIVE — AP31 (Addendum B). EMPIRICAL
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑31.B4 Circularity (Addendum B). LIVE — AP31 STRUCTURAL
AP32 — The Correction (Ethics) 8 kill switches. 1 non-negotiable.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑32.1 Destabilization measurement. LIVE — AP32 STRUCTURAL
KS‑32.2 Correction ranking. LIVE — AP32 STRUCTURAL KS‑32.3 Removal justification. LIVE — AP32 STRUCTURAL
KS‑32.4 One-I violation. LIVE — AP32 STRUCTURAL KS‑32.5 Genocide brake. LIVE — AP32 STRUCTURAL
KS‑32.6 Prevention superiority. LIVE — AP32 STRUCTURAL
KS‑32.7 Dehumanisation (MORAL KILL LIVE — NON- AP32 SWITCH). NEGOTIABLE KS‑32.8 Confidence unreachable. LIVE — AP32 STRUCTURAL
AP33 — The Boundary 9 kill switches. 3 non-negotiable.
KS ID Description Status Origin KS‑33.1 Agency definition. LIVE — AP33 STRUCTURAL KS‑33.2 ε jurisdiction boundary. LIVE — AP33 STRUCTURAL
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑33.3 Consent criterion. LIVE — AP33 STRUCTURAL
KS‑33.4 Agency priority. LIVE — AP33 STRUCTURAL
KS‑33.5 Allocation computation. LIVE — AP33 STRUCTURAL
KS‑33.6 Fixed floor calibration. LIVE — AP33 STRUCTURAL KS‑33.7 Enhancement weaponisation. LIVE — NON- AP33 NEGOTIABLE
KS‑33.8 Continuation budget corruption. LIVE — NON- AP33 NEGOTIABLE
KS‑33.9 One-I violation. LIVE — NON- AP33 NEGOTIABLE
AP34 — The Inversion 7 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑34.1 Alcohol data. LIVE — AP34 EMPIRICAL KS‑34.2 Cannabis data. LIVE — AP34 EMPIRICAL
KS‑34.3 Psilocybin data. LIVE — AP34 EMPIRICAL
KS‑34.4 Endogenous system. LIVE — AP34 EMPIRICAL
KS‑34.5 Drug classification. LIVE — AP34 STRUCTURAL
KS‑34.6 Legalisation destabilization. LIVE — AP34 EMPIRICAL KS‑34.7 Inversion justification. LIVE — AP34 EMPIRICAL
AP35 — The Ledger (Economics) 7 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑35.1 Conservation. LIVE — AP35 STRUCTURAL
KS‑35.2 Price mechanism. LIVE — AP35 STRUCTURAL
KS‑35.3 Extraction persistence. LIVE — AP35 EMPIRICAL
KS‑35.4 Buffer overflow. LIVE — AP35 EMPIRICAL KS‑35.5 Scale invariance. LIVE — AP35 STRUCTURAL
KS‑35.6 Audit proportionality. LIVE — AP35 EMPIRICAL
KS‑35.7 Keynesian override. LIVE — AP35 EMPIRICAL
AP36 — The Feed 9 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑36.1 Conservation (chemistry). LIVE — AP36 EMPIRICAL KS‑36.2 Surface necessity. LIVE — AP36 EMPIRICAL
KS‑36.3 Threshold completeness. LIVE — AP36 STRUCTURAL
KS‑36.4 Autocatalysis. LIVE — AP36 EMPIRICAL
KS‑36.5 Gradient dependency. LIVE — AP36 EMPIRICAL KS‑36.6 Dependency irreversibility. LIVE — AP36 STRUCTURAL
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑36.7 Toxic accumulation. LIVE — AP36 EMPIRICAL
KS‑36.8 Input capture. LIVE — AP36 STRUCTURAL
KS‑36.9 Persistence mechanism. LIVE — AP36 STRUCTURAL
AP37 — The First Boundary 8 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin KS‑37.1 Entropy tax. LIVE — AP37 EMPIRICAL
KS‑37.2 Correction necessity. LIVE — AP37 EMPIRICAL KS‑37.3 Mind-body coupling (placebo). LIVE — AP37 EMPIRICAL
KS‑37.4 Sovereignty requires function. LIVE — AP37 STRUCTURAL
KS‑37.5 Symptom as record. LIVE — AP37 STRUCTURAL KS‑37.6 Growth under stress. LIVE — AP37 EMPIRICAL
KS‑37.7 Maintenance necessity. LIVE — AP37 EMPIRICAL
KS‑37.8 Corridor boundaries. LIVE — AP37 EMPIRICAL
AP38 — The Exit 8 kill switches. 1 non-negotiable.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑38.1 Sovereignty failure. LIVE — AP38 STRUCTURAL
KS‑38.2 Modelling capacity. LIVE — AP38 STRUCTURAL
KS‑38.3 Slippery slope. LIVE — AP38 STRUCTURAL
KS‑38.4 Post-Agency misidentification. LIVE — AP38 EMPIRICAL KS‑38.5 Palliative sufficiency. Best-case: LIVE — AP38 need disappears. EMPIRICAL
KS‑38.6 Disability conflation. LIVE — NON- AP38 NEGOTIABLE
KS‑38.7 Pediatric exploitation. LIVE — AP38 STRUCTURAL
KS‑38.8 Master. Death is not operator LIVE — AP38 exit. STRUCTURAL
AP39 — The Scaffold 6 kill switches. 1 non-negotiable.
KS ID Description Status Origin KS‑39.1 Architecture A outperformance LIVE — AP39 (MASTER). EMPIRICAL
KS‑39.2 Forcing chain failure. LIVE — AP39 EMPIRICAL
KS‑39.3 Scaffold necessity. LIVE — AP39 STRUCTURAL
KS‑39.4 Historical attribution. LIVE — AP39 EMPIRICAL KS‑39.5 First-principles manipulation LIVE — AP39 (CRITICAL — body-of-work- STRUCTURAL level).
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑39.6 One-I violation. LIVE — NON- AP39 NEGOTIABLE
AP40 — The Irrational 6 kill switches. v3.0 listed 0; notebooks contain 6 explicit switches with formal registry. Added in v4.0.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑40.1 Irrationality of the governing LIVE AP40 axiom.
KS‑40.2 Pre-duality exemption / LIVE AP40 generative priority. KS‑40.3 Source of duality. LIVE AP40
KS‑40.4 Human uniqueness of irrational LIVE AP40 coupling.
KS‑40.5 Reducibility of irrationality. LIVE AP40
KS‑40.6 Necessity of irrationality / LIVE AP40 containment.
AP41 — The Loop 9 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑41.1 Visible fraction (1/21 ≈ 4.76%). LIVE — AP41 EMPIRICAL
KS‑41.2 Fusion as instantiation. LIVE — AP41 EMPIRICAL
KS‑41.3 Loop topology. Inherits KS-L0.1. LIVE AP41
KS‑41.4 α underivability. LIVE — HARD AP41
KS‑41.5 Channel-to-density mapping. LIVE — AP41 STRUCTURAL
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑41.6 Dark matter as un-actualised LIVE — AP41 possibility. EMPIRICAL
KS‑41.7 Present-tense Big Bang. LIVE — AP41 STRUCTURAL
KS‑41.8 Holographic splinter. LIVE — AP41 STRUCTURAL
KS‑41.9 Frame-dependence from the LIVE — AP41 break. STRUCTURAL
AP42 — The Clock 6 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑42.1 Dark matter particle detection. LIVE — AP42 DM particles with correct EMPIRICAL abundance → mechanism falsified.
KS‑42.2 Epoch dependence. Dark sector LIVE — AP42 composition must vary with EMPIRICAL epoch.
KS‑42.3 Defragmentation timescale LIVE — AP42 derivation. τ = (6/21) × t_H. STRUCTURAL KS‑42.4 Equation of state: intrinsic w = LIVE — AP42 −1; effective w_eff ≤ −1 with wₐ < EMPIRICAL 0 (phantom past, constant feeding); w₀ > −1 a live tension owed to D48. Killed by non- evolving or wrong-sign w.
KS‑42.5 Constant feeding rate. Assumes LIVE — AP42 constant BH feeding rate in §3. STRUCTURAL KS‑42.6 Timescale ratio derivation (dark LIVE — AP42 / sector). EMPIRICAL Predictions Part V
AP43 — The Gravity of Possibilities 5 kill switches.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑43.1 Domain-specific pattern LIVE — AP43 coherence aligns with Born- EMPIRICAL weighted slopes. Path 1 (lab) + Path 2 (chess/poker/elite athletic proxies).
KS‑43.2 Coupling capacity as substrate LIVE — AP43 of pattern coherence. Body’s EMPIRICAL accumulated record history determines pattern coherence ceiling.
KS‑43.3 Cross-domain transfer through LIVE — AP43 tracking coherence meta-skill. STRUCTURAL Operators with high TC in domain A acquire pattern coherence faster in domain B.
KS‑43.4 Pattern coherence as capacity- LIVE — AP43 allocation contextual only. STRUCTURAL Gleason non-contextuality as antecedent; finite capacity as sole modulator.
KS‑43.5 Structure-grounded ethic does LIVE — HARD AP43 not produce contradictory ethical conclusions. Cruelty as structural misread of operator- sameness.
277 kill switches across 43 Artist’s Proofs, counted as distinct switches (281 table rows, of which 4 are cross-listings of single switches: KS-4 in AP15/AP16; KS-41 in AP17/AP21; KS-2c/KS-I.6 in AP10/AP08; KS- Q.8/KS-L.1 in AP09/AP12). 12 closed. 1 conditionally closed (KS-Q.1). 2 addressed (KS-46B, KS-46C). 1 derived (KS-46A in AP22). 4 open debt (subset of live: KS-60, KS-65, KS-66, KS-67). 6 non-negotiable (subset of live: KS-32.7, KS-33.7, KS-33.8, KS-33.9, KS-38.6, KS-39.6). 1 superseded as value (KS-R.6, subset of live; see AP28). Two label collisions stand, disambiguated by origin: KS-L.1–L.4 (AP06 vs AP12) and KS-54 (AP21 vs
AP23). D-ID.1 remains reopened (one-interior formalisation). All other collisions resolved. If you want to kill the argument, start here.
Section II — Philosophy Switches 28 kill switches across the standalone volumes. These apply the axiomatic foundation of Section I to hermeneutic, relationship-geometric, and structural claims in the books. They are not derivation switches. They are publication switches — stated falsifiable conditions under which the books’ structural claims fail.
Being After Religion — The Front Door 9 named kill switches. Structural demolition of religion as Architecture A. The nine switches (KS-BAR.1–KS-BAR.9) apply R, B, C, and S violations to religion’s claim-validation procedures, with explicit falsification conditions for each. Added in v4.4; KS-BAR.9 admitted in v5.26 (the Crossing). KSBAR.6 is DEPENDENT — cross-references KS-AC.7 and survives even if that switch fires.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑BAR.1 Authority-validation as LIVE Being After Architecture A. The structural Religion claim: no authority-based ethic can architecturally exclude its own weaponisation — the harmful reading is always reachable, because the text underdetermines the reading and the validation procedure is circular (an R-violation: the authority’s validity is not testable against the record without appeal to the same authority). Fires if one is shown: not a tradition whose kind adherents mostly choose well, but a system whose structure itself makes the cruel reading unavailable. Sharpened v5.26; spine unchanged.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑BAR.2 Unfalsifiable consequence LIVE Being After claims. Religion makes Religion consequence claims that cannot be tested within the record — heaven, hell, karma, divine reward/punishment in the afterlife; fails the R-test directly. Fires if a religion’s consequence claims are restricted to record-testable outcomes.
KS‑BAR.3 Ungrounded distinctions. LIVE Being After Religion introduces categorical Religion distinctions whose structural source is not named — saved/damned, clean/unclean, sacred/profane, faithful/heretic; a B-violation: distinctions without break-source. Fires if a religion’s categorical distinctions can be shown to derive from {S, B, R, C}. KS‑BAR.4 The shared-world structural LIVE Being After fact. All readers share the same Religion coupling structure, the same axioms, the same one interior (KS-ID.1). Religion does not produce a separate substrate. Fires if a structural feature of the universe operates differently for religious and non-religious participants — an S-violation.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑BAR.5 The exit claim. Every coupling LIVE Being After pattern can be exited at the Religion level of future couplings (R: records irreversible, but new records can always be written). Exit costs may be social/cultural/economic but not structural. Fires if exit from religious participation is structurally barred rather than merely costly.
KS‑BAR.6 Cross-reference to Antichristos LIVE — Being After and KS-AC.7. The general DEPENDENT Religion religion-as-Architecture-A claim survives even if specific verse assignments in Antichristos fail. If KS-AC.7 fires at scale (many verse-assignments wrong), the specific Christianity claim weakens but KS-BAR.1–KS- BAR.5 survive independently.
KS‑BAR.7 Terminal ethic without religious LIVE Being After mediation. The terminal ethic Religion (don’t be a cunt, be kind) is derived in The Interior and AP43 §9 from the one-I (KS- ID.1) and corridor geometry, requiring no religious ground. Fires if the derivation can be shown to require a religious or transcendent ground that {S, B, R, C} does not provide.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑BAR.8 The structural-danger claim. A LIVE Being After book that publishes axiom- Religion derived demolition of religion’s validation procedure threatens those institutions structurally — not by hostility but by exposure. Fires if the arguments, accepted in full, would not materially undermine the structural authority of institutional religion. Test: a careful religious leader who reads it and accepts its arguments should find continued participation problematic.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑BAR.9 The Crossing. The on-page step LIVE Being After from geometry to obligation Religion rests on three legs: the operator constitutively acts to stay in being; operators are coupled; drift is irreversible. Paper D (AP01) carries the worked case — the operator-required charger: defection is a strict local gain (+4/hour) and a terminal move (partner ruin ≈ 6.4 h, defector ruin ≈ 13.5 h) — and AP02’s Theorem VI.2 (net- positive containment, KS- COUP.1) carries the network- scale result. Fires if any leg falls: an operator class that persists while not acting to stay in being; a coupled system under irreversible drift in which a sustained defector’s viability is preserved indefinitely; or a demonstration that the constitutive premise smuggles a normative term the derivation does not earn. The named edge — the operator who has truly stopped valuing its own corridor — is stated scope, not a firing condition. Admitted v5.26.
Antichristos — The Sacred Door 7 kill switches. Reclamation of the historical Jesus from institutional Christianity. Structural claim: the teaching is the geometry; the scaffold is what was built on top of it. KS-AC.6 is the master kill switch — if Architecture B sorts the way Architecture A sorts, the entire argument of the book fails. Updated in Final May 2026 to match the canonical descriptions in the published book (the v4.4 table carried earlier draft descriptions that were superseded).
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑AC.1 Pre-Johannine Greek Ego eimi LIVE Antichristos in exclusivity. If a pre- Johannine Greek source — datable to within one generation of Jesus — contains the Ego eimi formula in an unambiguous exclusivity context, the historical argument fails; exclusivity would predate John and could plausibly originate with the historical Jesus. Currently no such source exists. KS‑AC.2 LXX Ego eimi divine-name LIVE Antichristos significance. If the Septuagint Ego eimi in Exodus 3:14 can be demonstrated to carry no divine-name significance to first-century Jewish readers, the interpretive connection between the burning bush and John’s Ego eimi statements collapses. The I AM reading loses its Exodus foundation.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑AC.3 Forced mappings in Chapter 10. LIVE Antichristos If any mapping in Chapter 10 requires the addition of premises not present in either Jesus’s words or the geometry’s derivation, that specific mapping is forced and must be retracted. Mappings must stand on what is present, not on what is added. KS‑AC.4 Thomas-derives-from-John. If LIVE Antichristos the sayings tradition preserved in Thomas can be demonstrated to derive from the Gospel of John rather than representing an independent stream of Jesus material, its value as evidence for a pre- exclusivity tradition collapses. Test is independence, not dating.
KS‑AC.5 Coherent exclusivity reading of LIVE Antichristos John 10:34, 14:20, 17:21. If a coherent reading of those verses consistent with exclusivity rather than universality can be demonstrated, the internal- evidence layer fails and the scaffold’s reading of those verses stands. KS‑AC.6 Architecture-sorting- LIVE — MASTER Antichristos equivalence (MASTER KILL SWITCH). If Architecture B produces the same sorting behaviour as Architecture A in any tested domain, the structural distinction between them collapses and the entire book’s argument fails. Architecture B must not sort. If it sorts, it is the scaffold wearing different clothes.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑AC.7 Verse-level structural test. Each LIVE — Antichristos verse the book engages or STRUCTURAL assigns is open to falsification at the verse level. If a scaffold- assigned verse survives all four axiom tests (R, B, C, S) under fair structural reading, that assignment fails. If an axiomatic-assigned verse fails one or more axiom tests, that assignment fails. Challenges to be addressed verse by verse, not framework-wide.
The Relationship Corridor — The Personal Door 11 kill switches. Two-person corridor geometry: width as coupling capacity, length as time. Applies AP01 (Actualization State) and AP02 (Operator) to the relationship domain. KS-RC.9–KS-RC.11 added with the Chapter 11 (The Unsigned Contract) integration: measurement-vs-love distinction, renunciation-vs-restoration distinction.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑RC.1 Lying as paradigm case of LIVE Corridor irrational coupling capacity.
KS‑RC.2 Width recoverability. Damaged LIVE Corridor coupling capacity can recover within remaining length. KS‑RC.3 Corridor convergence. Two LIVE Corridor corridors can converge toward one. KS‑RC.4 Time primacy. Length is LIVE Corridor irreversible and cannot be recovered. KS‑RC.5 Absolute honesty necessity. LIVE Corridor Restoration after betrayal requires it. KS‑RC.6 Self-deception as override. Self- LIVE Corridor lying breaks the interior model.
KS‑RC.7 Exit as structurally distinct from LIVE Corridor betrayal.
KS‑RC.8 Structural definition of love. LIVE Corridor Depends on the one-I claim (KS-ID.1; formalisation owed at D-ID.1).
KS‑RC.9 The Unsigned Contract. Pain LIVE Corridor experienced as betrayal that derives from a unilaterally projected expectation rather than a mutually held model. Distinct from KS-RC.7 (exit) and the Chapter 10 betrayal framework.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑RC.10 Measurement versus Love. LIVE Corridor Discriminates measurement- instrument failure (unsigned contract collapse) from love failure (real betrayal). The reading is real in both cases; the meaning is structurally different.
KS‑RC.11 Renunciation versus LIVE Corridor Restoration. Two structurally distinct operations: restoration writes new records into a corridor that held a mutual deal; renunciation dissolves a false record-set the operator carried alone. Conflating them reapplies the same instrument and produces the same suffering.
The Interior — The Operational Door 1 kill switch unique to the volume. All other kill switches referenced in The Interior (KS-31.*, KS-32.*, KS-AP29.*) are already registered in Section I under their originating APs. The Interior also references KS-25.1 (Born rule derivation from record algebra without additional postulates) as a Section I AP25 kill switch; this label does not currently appear in the Section I AP25 table (which carries KS-55, KS-56, KS-57) and the closest registry equivalent is KS-Q.1 (Born rule derivation, COND. CLOSED). Flagged here for AP25 reconciliation. The v5.15 Notebook III pass confirms the provenance: the complex Hilbert space and the conditional Born rule are AP09 (KS-Q.1, COND. CLOSED on KS-Q.7); the unconditional Gleason-route derivation is AP25 (KS-55/56/57). The Interior’s in-book KS-25.1 label update is owed at that volume’s own pass.
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑ID.1 One-I / topological singularity LIVE — DEBT Interior of the interior. If the break produces multiple independent interiors rather than one, the one-I claim fails. Open debt: not yet formalised in any AP. Referenced by KS-32.4, KS- 33.9, KS-39.6 as their source claim.
The Illusion of the Other — The Gentle Door 0 named kill switches. By design: the book’s tonal contract is gentle entry and does not carry a numbered kill-switch apparatus. The formal kill switches for every claim in the book appear in the companion volumes and in Section I of this registry.
Section II Summary 28 kill switches across the standalone volumes: 7 in Antichristos, 11 in the Corridor, 1 in the Interior, 9 in Being After Religion. 28 LIVE. KS-ID.1 (one-I) remains LIVE as the book-level register of the one-interior claim; its formalisation debt D-ID.1 is REOPENED (v5.11) — the cited “AP29 Step 8” derivation is not present in the body of work (see below). The Relationship Corridor gains three new switches with the Chapter 11 (The Unsigned Contract) integration: KS-RC.9 (the unsigned contract phenomenon), KSRC.10 (measurement vs love), KS-RC.11 (renunciation vs restoration).
Reopened debt: D-ID.1 — One-I formalisation. REOPENED May 2026 (v5.11); status unchanged in v5.12. An earlier draft (v4.2) recorded the one-interior claim as formally derived in an “AP29 Step 8”, with switches KS-AP29.8/.9/.10. That derivation is not present in the body of work; v5.11 removed the three phantom switches and reopened the debt. KS-ID.1 in The Interior remains the book-level register of the claim; KS-32.4, KS- 33.9, and KS-39.6 remain as downstream consequence checks. The formal three-case exhaustion proof is owed.
Section III — Ø Models Series Switches 256 kill switches across the four philosophical-register volumes of the Ø Models series, plus 5 new physics switches contributed by Ø Predictions and registered in Section I under their originating Artist’s Proofs. Predictions contributes 5 new switches (KS-30.4, KS-NPP.1, KS-NPP.2, KSNPP.3, KS-42.6) — the remainder of the 25 switches it enumerates are book-level applications of switches already in Section I. Dissolutions contributes 61 dissolution switches (PZ-N.M). Resolutions contributes 66 resolution switches (RES-N.M, including RES-8.5.1–5 for Chapter 8.5). Horizons contributes 68 horizon switches (HOR-N.M). Applications contributes 61 application switches (APP-N.M). The PZ/RES/HOR/APP switches are not derivation switches; they are publication switches — falsifiable conditions under which each chapter’s structural reading fails.
Ø Predictions — The Falsifiable Physics-Facing Volume 25 kill switches enumerated across five Parts. 20 are book-level applications of switches already registered in Section I (KS-30.1–3 in AP30; KS-R.7–10 in AP28; KS-42.1–5 in AP42; KS-45 in AP18; KS-42, KS-43 in AP17; KS-46/47 referenced under historical numbering corresponding to AP18/AP22). 5 are new and are added to the registry below.
New switches introduced by Ø Predictions (added to registry) KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑30.4 Alternative formula. LIVE — AP30 / STRUCTURAL Predictions Part I
KS‑NPP.1 Two-component decomposition. LIVE — AP30 / STRUCTURAL Predictions Part III
KS‑NPP.2 Sign of the difference. LIVE — AP30 / STRUCTURAL Predictions Part III
KS ID Description Status Origin
KS‑NPP.3 Lattice QCD consistency. LIVE — AP30 / STRUCTURAL Predictions Part III
KS‑42.6 Timescale ratio derivation. LIVE — AP42 / EMPIRICAL Predictions Part V
Full Predictions enumeration (cross-referenced to Section I where applicable) KS ID Description Part Section I Map
KS‑30.1 Non-additive combination. Part I AP30 KS-30.1
KS‑30.2 Leakage anisotropy. Part I AP30 KS-30.2
KS‑30.3 Higher-order misbehaviour. Part I AP30 KS-30.3
KS‑30.4 Alternative formula. Part I NEW — added to AP30
KS‑R.10 Unification structure. Part II AP28 KS-R.10
KS‑R.7 G prediction. Part II AP28 KS-R.7
KS‑R.8a Face completeness. Part II AP28 KS-R.8a
KS‑R.8b Actualization scope. Part II AP28 KS-R.8b
KS‑R.8c Channel independence. Part II AP28 KS-R.8c
KS‑R.8d Uniform coupling. Part II AP28 KS-R.8d
KS‑R.9 Puncture geometry. Part II AP28 KS-R.9
KS‑NPP.1 Two-component Part III NEW — added to decomposition. AP30
KS‑NPP.2 Sign of the difference. Part III NEW — added to AP30
KS‑NPP.3 Lattice QCD consistency. Part III NEW — added to AP30
KS‑42 Tension field equation (open Part IV AP17 KS-42 debt). (CLOSED in v4.4 via Rosin V7)
KS‑43 Interpolation function (open Part IV AP17 KS-43 debt). KS‑45 Coherent fraction. Part IV AP18 KS-45
KS ID Description Part Section I Map
KS‑46 S² correction. Part IV AP18 (historical numbering; cf. KS-45.1 in current registry)
KS‑47 Dipolar topology. Part IV AP18 KS-45.2 (historical numbering)
KS‑42.1 Dark matter particle detection. Part V AP42 KS-42.1
KS‑42.2 Epoch dependence. Part V AP42 KS-42.2
KS‑42.3 Defragmentation timescale Part V AP42 KS-42.3 derivation. (book and registry agree: “Defragmentation timescale derivation”; the claim rests on face-erasure as the atomic unit. v5.9 naming- variance flag cleared in v5.10.)
KS‑42.4 Equation of state. Part V AP42 KS-42.4
KS‑42.5 Constant feeding rate. Part V AP42 KS-42.5
KS‑42.6 Timescale ratio derivation. Part V NEW — added to AP42
Ø Dissolutions — Twelve Classical Problems Structurally Resolved 61 kill switches across 12 chapters. Chapter 1 carries six (the founding chapter establishes the method; the additional switch concerns directional clarity); the other eleven chapters carry five each. PZ-N.M format throughout.
Chapter 1 — Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑1.1 The break is constitutive of 1:1’s LIVE Dissolutions existence. Ch.1
PZ‑1.2 Total-level indistinguishability LIVE Dissolutions is non-existence. Ch.1
PZ‑1.3 Non-comparative nothing. LIVE Dissolutions Ch.1
PZ‑1.4 The break requires no external LIVE Dissolutions cause. Ch.1
PZ‑1.5 The retrospective move is LIVE Dissolutions structural, not merely semantic. Ch.1
PZ‑1.6 Directional clarity of the LIVE Dissolutions argument. Ch.1
Chapter 2 — What Exists? KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑2.1 Existence is record- LIVE Dissolutions instantiation in the Ch.2 actualisation state.
PZ‑2.2 The six classical positions are LIVE Dissolutions partial readings. Ch.2
PZ‑2.3 Matter is a kind of coupling, not LIVE Dissolutions the substrate. Ch.2
PZ‑2.4 Mathematical structure is a LIVE Dissolutions relational reading, not a Ch.2 separate domain.
PZ‑2.5 The actualisation state is the LIVE Dissolutions only domain. Ch.2
Chapter 3 — The Mind-Body Problem KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑3.1 Outside-reading and inside- LIVE Dissolutions reading are symmetric. Ch.3
PZ‑3.2 Mind is coupling read from LIVE Dissolutions inside. Ch.3
PZ‑3.3 Resolution, not emergence. LIVE Dissolutions Ch.3
PZ‑3.4 Zombie incoherence. LIVE Dissolutions Ch.3
PZ‑3.5 Two readings, not two LIVE Dissolutions processes. Ch.3
Chapter 4 — The Hard Problem of Consciousness KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑4.1 The operator runs without the LIVE Dissolutions narrator. Ch.4
PZ‑4.2 The operator-narrator LIVE Dissolutions distinction is structural, not Ch.4 descriptive. PZ‑4.3 The narrator is downstream of LIVE Dissolutions the operator. Ch.4
PZ‑4.4 The hard problem is a level- LIVE Dissolutions error. Ch.4
PZ‑4.5 The relocated question is LIVE Dissolutions tractable in kind, not only in Ch.4 phrasing.
Chapter 5 — Personal Identity and the Self KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑5.1 The self is narrator-layer, not LIVE Dissolutions operator-layer. Ch.5
PZ‑5.2 Identity is continuity of self- LIVE Dissolutions reading loop, operator- Ch.5 mediated across gaps.
KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑5.3 Identity is loop-continuity, not LIVE Dissolutions content-continuity. Ch.5
PZ‑5.4 Fission ends one self-reading, LIVE Dissolutions begins two. Ch.5
PZ‑5.5 The “I” is the self-reading loop, LIVE Dissolutions nothing more. Ch.5
Chapter 6 — Other Minds KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑6.1 The one-interior claim holds. LIVE Dissolutions Ch.6
PZ‑6.2 Coupling between windows is LIVE Dissolutions the interior expressing at two Ch.6 sites.
PZ‑6.3 Solipsism requires an added LIVE Dissolutions axiom of a different kind. Ch.6
PZ‑6.4 Records are local to the window LIVE Dissolutions that writes them. Ch.6
PZ‑6.5 Phenomenological asymmetry LIVE Dissolutions requires nothing beyond Ch.6 record-locality.
Chapter 7 — Free Will and Determinism KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑7.1 Absolute free will requires LIVE Dissolutions separation the axiom does not Ch.7 produce.
PZ‑7.2 Absolute determinism LIVE Dissolutions misdescribes coupling as Ch.7 scripted trajectory.
PZ‑7.3 Coupling happens under LIVE Dissolutions constraint, without Ch.7 determination.
PZ‑7.4 Responsibility attaches at the LIVE Dissolutions operator layer. Ch.7
KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑7.5 Operator-layer responsibility LIVE Dissolutions lifts only under structural Ch.7 narrator-severance.
Chapter 8 — The Is-Ought Problem KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑8.1 Is and ought are two readings LIVE Dissolutions of one coupling. Ch.8
PZ‑8.2 Interior-sharing is structural, LIVE Dissolutions not smuggled. Ch.8
PZ‑8.3 Self-preservation is structural. LIVE Dissolutions Ch.8
PZ‑8.4 Compassion is the strongest LIVE Dissolutions weighting of correctly-read Ch.8 geometry.
PZ‑8.5 Correct reading is a cognitive LIVE Dissolutions achievement. Ch.8
Chapter 9 — The Structural Ground of Ethics KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑9.1 The ethical measure is what LIVE Dissolutions propagates. Ch.9
PZ‑9.2 Joint viable set is structurally LIVE Dissolutions definable. Ch.9
PZ‑9.3 Parasitic contraction is LIVE Dissolutions structurally distinguishable from Ch.9 cooperative and from genuine zero-sum.
PZ‑9.4 Responsibility is grounded in LIVE Dissolutions override-capacity under Ch.9 knowable consequence.
PZ‑9.5 The terminal ethic is derivable LIVE Dissolutions from the axiom without Ch.9 imported premises.
Chapter 10 — The Meaning of Life KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑10.1 Meaning fuses three structurally LIVE Dissolutions separable senses. Ch.10
PZ‑10.2 Purpose at the window’s scale LIVE Dissolutions is orientation of coupling Ch.10 capacity, under both prior history and override-capacity.
PZ‑10.3 Significance at the joint scale is LIVE Dissolutions propagation into the joint viable Ch.10 set. PZ‑10.4 The refusal of absolute LIVE Dissolutions grounding does not collapse to Ch.10 nihilism. PZ‑10.5 Meaning-crisis operates at LIVE Dissolutions narrator-layer, operator-layer, or Ch.10 both.
Chapter 11 — The Problem of Induction and the Nature of Time KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑11.1 Time is what R structurally is, LIVE Dissolutions read from the single now at Ch.11 which the axiom executes.
PZ‑11.2 The AS is singular, not one-per- LIVE Dissolutions site. Ch.11
PZ‑11.3 Induction is structural- LIVE Dissolutions constraint reading, not bridging Ch.11 inference.
PZ‑11.4 The axiom is not an inductive LIVE Dissolutions claim. Ch.11
PZ‑11.5 Structurally governed versus LIVE Dissolutions narrator-constructed predicates Ch.11 are distinguishable.
Chapter 12 — The Measurement Problem KS ID Description Status Origin
PZ‑12.1 Observer is any coupling LIVE Dissolutions configuration forcing non- Ch.12 optionality.
PZ‑12.2 Observer and observed are two LIVE Dissolutions positions in one AS, not two Ch.12 kinds of system.
PZ‑12.3 No additional event at LIVE Dissolutions measurement beyond the Ch.12 coupling. PZ‑12.4 The forcing function is the LIVE Dissolutions structural process at coupling. Ch.12
PZ‑12.5 The narrator is downstream of LIVE Dissolutions the coupling that forced the Ch.12 outcome.
Ø Resolutions — Thirteen Further Problems 66 kill switches across 13 chapters. Chapter 8.5 carries an additional five switches (RES-8.5.1–5) using three-level numbering to disambiguate from RES-8.5 (Chapter 8’s fifth switch). Chapter 12 carries six. The other chapters carry five each. RES-N.M format throughout.
Chapter 1 — The Nature of Information KS ID Description Status Origin
RES‑1.1 Information without record. LIVE Resolutions Ch.1
RES‑1.2 Record without information. LIVE Resolutions Ch.1
RES‑1.3 Sub-bit asymmetry below ε. LIVE Resolutions Ch.1
RES‑1.4 Landauer not tied to R. LIVE Resolutions Ch.1
RES‑1.5 A more parsimonious account. LIVE Resolutions Ch.1
Chapter 2 — The Source of Mathematics KS ID Description Status Origin RES‑2.1 A mathematical structure whose LIVE Resolutions truth cannot be expressed as a Ch.2 relation between records or constraints on records.
RES‑2.2 A logic structurally forced LIVE Resolutions beyond the binary at the floor. Ch.2
RES‑2.3 Algebraic structure not LIVE Resolutions reducible to record- Ch.2 composition or record-policy.
RES‑2.4 A geometry whose locality LIVE Resolutions structure cannot be traced to Ch.2 bounded propagation.
RES‑2.5 A canonical extension of LIVE Resolutions mathematics requiring a Ch.2 primitive the axiom cannot install as a record-policy.
Chapter 3 — Abstract Objects and Universals KS ID Description Status Origin
RES‑3.1 A universal whose instances LIVE Resolutions share no relational structure Ch.3 under any operation.
RES‑3.2 A property not readable as a LIVE Resolutions stable response or coupling Ch.3 pattern under any operation.
RES‑3.3 A proposition whose content is LIVE Resolutions not a recordable constraint at Ch.3 any layer. RES‑3.4 A feature of universals not LIVE Resolutions capturable as invariant, Ch.3 coupling-pattern, recordable constraint, or record-policy.
RES‑3.5 The counting-invariant is LIVE Resolutions conventional rather than Ch.3 structural.
Chapter 4 — Laws of Nature KS ID Description Status Origin
RES‑4.1 A genuine lawlike constraint LIVE Resolutions with no structural source in {S, Ch.4 B, R, C}.
RES‑4.2 A regularity that supports LIVE Resolutions counterfactuals across all Ch.4 standard tests but has no structural constraint from {S, B, R, ….
RES‑4.3 QM and GR require different LIVE Resolutions structural primitives. Ch.4
RES‑4.4 {S, B, R, C} as currently LIVE Resolutions axiomatised is consistent with Ch.4 two different values of the actualisation rate without furth…. RES‑4.5 Counterfactual force grounded LIVE Resolutions without trajectory-space. Ch.4
Chapter 5 — Causation KS ID Description Status Origin
RES‑5.1 A causal relation that cannot be LIVE Resolutions expressed as record- Ch.5 propagation or record- constraint under bounded C.
RES‑5.2 Strong backward causation LIVE Resolutions permitted by {S, B, R, C}. Ch.5
RES‑5.3 Causal counterfactual LIVE Resolutions dependence not modellable as Ch.5 removal or alteration of a record in counterfactual trajectory-space.
RES‑5.4 Structural dissociation of the LIVE Resolutions cause-effect asymmetry from Ch.5 R’s direction-preservation.
RES‑5.5 A physical process that LIVE Resolutions genuinely propagates record- Ch.5 bearing influence faster than C permits.
Chapter 6 — Motion and the Paradoxes of Zeno KS ID Description Status Origin RES‑6.1 Finite motion requiring actual LIVE Resolutions execution of an infinite ordered Ch.6 sequence. RES‑6.2 Record-bearing motion derived LIVE Resolutions without C at a finite rate. Ch.6
RES‑6.3 The now / writing-edge account LIVE Resolutions incompatible with Lorentz- Ch.6 invariant causal structure.
RES‑6.4 A classical paradox of motion LIVE Resolutions structurally equivalent to Zeno’s Ch.6 continuum-decomposition problem whose closure require…. RES‑6.5 The now-installation requires LIVE Resolutions resources beyond {S, B, R, C}. Ch.6
Chapter 7 — Persistence Through Change KS ID Description Status Origin
RES‑7.1 Record-lineage continuity not LIVE Resolutions structurally distinguishable from Ch.7 material-lineage continuity.
RES‑7.2 An object whose persistence- LIVE Resolutions pattern requires a substance Ch.7 beneath.
RES‑7.3 Ship-lineage and self-lineage LIVE Resolutions do not share the persistence- Ch.7 form of lineage under R. RES‑7.4 A structural selector overriding LIVE Resolutions referent-specification. Ch.7
RES‑7.5 A class of entity whose LIVE Resolutions persistence requires a primitive Ch.7 other than R-preserved pattern at a site.
Chapter 8 — Modality KS ID Description Status Origin
RES‑8.1 Counterfactual force grounded LIVE Resolutions in something other than Ch.8 trajectory-space under minimal- intervention discipline.
RES‑8.2 Necessities requiring LIVE Resolutions irreducibly different primitives. Ch.8
RES‑8.3 A modal claim the LIVE Resolutions actualisation-state-read-three- Ch.8 ways cannot express.
RES‑8.4 Possible-world ontology LIVE Resolutions required, not merely possible- Ch.8 world semantics.
RES‑8.5 Two of the three readings LIVE Resolutions collapse, making the third Ch.8 superfluous.
Chapter 8.5 — Choice KS ID Description Status Origin
RES‑8.5.1 Sentient commitment reducible LIVE Resolutions in principle to prior-record Ch.8.5 computation.
RES‑8.5.2 No shared structural form LIVE Resolutions between quantum residual and Ch.8.5 choice residual.
RES‑8.5.3 Override reducible to deeper LIVE Resolutions computation with no operator- Ch.8.5 layer residual. RES‑8.5.4 Override with no structural cost. LIVE Resolutions Ch.8.5
RES‑8.5.5 Determinism and free will LIVE Resolutions incompatible at some load- Ch.8.5 bearing level on this account.
Chapter 9 — The Origin of Life KS ID Description Status Origin
RES‑9.1 A living system whose LIVE Resolutions persistence does not involve Ch.9 dynamic kinetic stability.
RES‑9.2 The chemistry-to-biology LIVE Resolutions transition requires a principle Ch.9 outside {S, B, R, C}.
RES‑9.3 No structurally specifiable LIVE Resolutions threshold. Ch.9
RES‑9.4 Full persistence-inversion LIVE Resolutions conditions insufficient for life. Ch.9
RES‑9.5 Record-constrained self- LIVE Resolutions regeneration separable from Ch.9 life.
Chapter 10 — Other Intelligences KS ID Description Status Origin
RES‑10.1 Substrate material is load- LIVE Resolutions bearing for self-registration, Ch.10 modelling, or valence.
RES‑10.2 A criterion for consciousness LIVE Resolutions the axiom endorses. Ch.10
RES‑10.3 Valenced self-registration LIVE Resolutions without welfare obligation. Ch.10
RES‑10.4 The one-interior claim from Ø LIVE Resolutions Dissolutions Chapter 6 applies Ch.10 only to biological architectures.
RES‑10.5 Species-membership is load- LIVE Resolutions bearing for obligation. Ch.10
Chapter 11 — The Problem of Death KS ID Description Status Origin
RES‑11.1 The one-interior claim does not LIVE Resolutions support the building/window Ch.11 distinction.
RES‑11.2 A fourth structural fact of death. LIVE Resolutions Ch.11
RES‑11.3 Grief grounded without the LIVE Resolutions closing-of-coupling-pathways Ch.11 account. RES‑11.4 A case where the interior itself LIVE Resolutions is diminished at a window’s Ch.11 closing. RES‑11.5 A structurally specifiable LIVE Resolutions continuation of the self-reading Ch.11 loop after coupling-architecture disassembly.
Chapter 12 — The Problem of Evil KS ID Description Status Origin
RES‑12.1 A case of suffering that cannot LIVE Resolutions be reduced to damaging Ch.12 coupling registered by a valenced self-registering architecture. RES‑12.2 The dissolution collapses into LIVE Resolutions nihilism: refusing theodicy Ch.12 entails no responsibility.
RES‑12.3 A case of catastrophic innocent LIVE Resolutions suffering the dissolution cannot Ch.12 hold without collapsing back into theodicy.
RES‑12.4 Act at override-capacity without LIVE Resolutions importing an ethical premise. Ch.12
RES‑12.5 Explained is in fact excused. LIVE Resolutions Ch.12
RES‑12.6 The refusal of theodicy makes LIVE Resolutions the structural response Ch.12 unmotivated.
Ø Applications — The Architecture-B Civilisational Volume 61 kill switches across 12 chapters. Chapter 12 carries six (the closing chapter tests the not-planning / not-market disarm); the other eleven carry five each. APP-N.M format throughout.
Chapter 1 — The Architecture of Property KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑1.1 Exhibit a form of property LIVE Applications whose legitimacy cannot be Ch.1 expressed as coupling-capacity provenance plus cooperative prop…. APP‑1.2 Show that the parasitic / LIVE Applications cooperative distinction is not Ch.1 structurally measurable at the propagation site.
APP‑1.3 Demonstrate that inheritance LIVE Applications structurally severs provenance. Ch.1
APP‑1.4 Produce a widely-accepted LIVE Applications property form whose legitimacy Ch.1 the model cannot ground.
APP‑1.5 Show that the test ratifies the LIVE Applications current distribution by default. Ch.1
Chapter 2 — The Architecture of Law KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑2.1 Show that the stabilising / LIVE Applications destabilising classification Ch.2 requires an external value premise the chapter has not supplied. APP‑2.2 Derive a different correction- LIVE Applications hierarchy ordering from the Ch.2 same structural conditions.
KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑2.3 Removal structurally preferred LIVE Applications despite sufficient lower-level Ch.2 correction.
APP‑2.4 Demonstrate that bias auditing LIVE Applications cannot be done structurally. Ch.2
APP‑2.5 Produce a class of harm where LIVE Applications the hierarchy’s structural Ch.2 ordering fails.
Chapter 3 — The Architecture of Governance KS ID Description Status Origin APP‑3.1 Show that ε is not computable LIVE Applications from interaction data, in Ch.3 principle. APP‑3.2 Exhibit a case where two LIVE Applications structural readings of the same Ch.3 decision produce incompatible verdicts.
APP‑3.3 Produce decisions the LIVE Applications structural reading cannot Ch.3 address.
APP‑3.4 Show vulnerability to capture or LIVE Applications systematic error the protocol Ch.3 cannot address. APP‑3.5 Demonstrate that the voting LIVE Applications residual is large enough to Ch.3 break the policy claim.
Chapter 4 — The Architecture of Economics KS ID Description Status Origin APP‑4.1 Show that price is not the LIVE Applications resolution of a probability field Ch.4 over a coupling-event’s structural value, in either open….
KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑4.2 Exhibit a financial crisis not LIVE Applications framable as record/capacity Ch.4 misalignment or buffer failure.
APP‑4.3 Demonstrate that taxation-as- LIVE Applications maintenance cannot be Ch.4 distinguished from extraction without an external normative premise.
APP‑4.4 Demonstrate that the buffer’s LIVE Applications parasitic-accumulation Ch.4 threshold is structurally unspecifiable in principle.
APP‑4.5 Show that the derived economy LIVE Applications reduces without remainder to Ch.4 an existing economic school.
Chapter 5 — Medicine and the Viability Corridor KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑5.1 Exhibit a medical case where LIVE Applications level three is structurally Ch.5 preferred to level one despite level one being available.
APP‑5.2 Show that coupling-capacity LIVE Applications projection cannot be computed Ch.5 without age or ability bias.
APP‑5.3 Demonstrate that the dignity LIVE Applications floor is not specifiable in Ch.5 structural terms.
APP‑5.4 Produce a major disease class LIVE Applications the hierarchy cannot handle. Ch.5
APP‑5.5 Show that the prevention-first LIVE Applications commitment is contradicted by Ch.5 empirical data.
Chapter 6 — Genetic Engineering KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑6.1 Show that widening and LIVE Applications narrowing are not stable across Ch.6 ambiguous cases.
APP‑6.2 Exhibit an edit clearly corridor- LIVE Applications widening and clearly parasitic. Ch.6
APP‑6.3 Demonstrate that future LIVE Applications override-capacity cannot be Ch.6 estimated.
APP‑6.4 Produce a case where the LIVE Applications axiom permits enhancement Ch.6 beyond disease correction.
APP‑6.5 Show parental authority LIVE Applications incompatible with the chapter’s Ch.6 framing.
Chapter 7 — Cognitive Sovereignty and Addiction KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑7.1 Show that cognitive sovereignty LIVE Applications holds even where the operator’s Ch.7 coupling has eroded self- reading capacity.
APP‑7.2 Exhibit a case where LIVE Applications externalised destruction Ch.7 crossing ε cannot be measured without importing value. APP‑7.3 Demonstrate that the noise- LIVE Applications floor framing fails for a major Ch.7 mental-illness class. APP‑7.4 Produce a case where LIVE Applications condemnation of an addictive Ch.7 pathway structurally aids corridor-widening.
APP‑7.5 Show that the chapter’s worked LIVE Applications case is selectively chosen. Ch.7
Chapter 8 — Transhumanism and the Augmented Window KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑8.1 Show that impedance matching LIVE Applications is not specifiable. Ch.8
APP‑8.2 Exhibit augmentation that LIVE Applications outruns control yet preserves Ch.8 coherent self-reading.
APP‑8.3 Demonstrate biomatter transfer LIVE Applications as parasitic in some structural Ch.8 form.
APP‑8.4 Produce a transhumanist LIVE Applications proposal the chapter cannot Ch.8 dispatch.
APP‑8.5 Show that “shatters self- LIVE Applications reading” lacks structural Ch.8 ground.
Chapter 9 — End-of-Life Care and the Right to Exit KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑9.1 Exhibit a case where the right LIVE Applications to exit cannot be derived from Ch.9 operator authority without importing autonomy as a sepa….
APP‑9.2 Show that the corridor-cannot- LIVE Applications be-re-widened condition is not Ch.9 structurally measurable.
APP‑9.3 Demonstrate that the operator- LIVE Applications vs-narrator distinction collapses Ch.9 at the corridor’s closing. APP‑9.4 Produce a case where LIVE Applications extending the corridor against Ch.9 the operator’s reading is structurally correct.
APP‑9.5 Show that the dignity floor LIVE Applications cannot be specified at the Ch.9 closing without cultural import.
Chapter 10 — The Architecture of Environmental Stewardship KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑10.1 Show that long-timescale LIVE Applications propagation cannot be Ch.10 measured at policy-relevant resolution.
APP‑10.2 Exhibit substrate-degradation LIVE Applications where the correction hierarchy Ch.10 fails.
APP‑10.3 Demonstrate that biosphere-as- LIVE Applications joint-structure imports value Ch.10 beyond the axiom.
APP‑10.4 Show that human-supremacist LIVE Applications substrate-coupling produces Ch.10 the same prescriptions without smuggling in substrate standing. APP‑10.5 Show that stewardship-as- LIVE Applications structural-fact reduces in Ch.10 practice to current environmentalism.
Chapter 11 — The Architecture of Collective Force KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑11.1 Show that the verifiable- LIVE Applications contraction-greater-than-force Ch.11 criterion cannot be measured at policy-relevant resolution.
APP‑11.2 Exhibit a conflict where every LIVE Applications party fails the test, yet inaction Ch.11 also fails — and the chapter cannot specify which f…. APP‑11.3 Exhibit a case where the LIVE Applications structural test produces a Ch.11 sharply asymmetrical verdict that the chapter’s anti-capture disc….
KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑11.4 Produce a class of collective LIVE Applications force the criterion does not Ch.11 classify.
APP‑11.5 Show that the structural test LIVE Applications reduces in practice to Ch.11 mainstream just-war theory.
Chapter 12 — The Architecture of Global Resource Allocation KS ID Description Status Origin
APP‑12.1 Show that the geometric region LIVE Applications is structurally underdetermined Ch.12 beyond use.
APP‑12.2 Exhibit substrate where LIVE Applications geometry produces Ch.12 destabilising distribution.
APP‑12.3 Demonstrate that the corrective LIVE Applications requires fiat the chapter’s Ch.12 framing rules out.
APP‑12.4 Produce a class of resource the LIVE Applications model cannot allocate. Ch.12
APP‑12.5 Show that structural distribution LIVE Applications reduces to mainstream Ch.12 economics.
APP‑12.6 Show that the not-planning / LIVE Applications not-market disarm conceals a Ch.12 hidden third position that imports the same authority struc….
Ø Horizons — The Closing Volume 68 kill switches across 13 chapters. Chapters 1–9 carry five each; Chapters 10, 12, and 13 carry six each; Chapter 11 carries five. HOR-N.M format throughout.
Chapter 1 — The Nature of Beauty and Aesthetics KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑1.1 Coupling coherence is LIVE Horizons Ch.1 structurally unmeasurable.
HOR‑1.2 Exhibit registered beauty whose LIVE Horizons Ch.1 coherence cannot be structurally specified. HOR‑1.3 The projection fails across LIVE Horizons Ch.1 cultures.
HOR‑1.4 Produce a sublime case the LIVE Horizons Ch.1 corridor-expansion account misses.
HOR‑1.5 Projection reduces without LIVE Horizons Ch.1 remainder to existing aesthetic theory.
Chapter 2 — Music and Harmonic Structure KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑2.1 The low-entropy phase- LIVE Horizons Ch.2 relationship account fails to predict consonance across diverse traditions.
HOR‑2.2 Exhibit music without trackable LIVE Horizons Ch.2 temporal, spectral, or dynamic trajectory.
HOR‑2.3 Demonstrate non-human LIVE Horizons Ch.2 responses do not fit the structural account.
HOR‑2.4 Produce a tradition where the LIVE Horizons Ch.2 octave is structurally not privileged.
KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑2.5 The propositional-bypass claim LIVE Horizons Ch.2 reduces without remainder to existing music-cognition theory.
Chapter 3 — The Nature of Play and Games KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑3.1 Play cannot be structurally LIVE Horizons Ch.3 distinguished from work or instrumental training.
HOR‑3.2 Exhibit play that is not override- LIVE Horizons Ch.3 capacity training. HOR‑3.3 Demonstrate that games with LIVE Horizons Ch.3 irreversible outcomes still count as play in the structural sense. HOR‑3.4 Produce an architecture with LIVE Horizons Ch.3 high override-capacity and no complex play.
HOR‑3.5 The corridor-expansion-as-fun LIVE Horizons Ch.3 account reduces without remainder to existing accounts of play-pleasure.
Chapter 4 — The Nature of Narrative and Story KS ID Description Status Origin HOR‑4.1 Structural-truth reduces without LIVE Horizons remainder to another truth Ch.4 criterion. HOR‑4.2 Exhibit a narrative the LIVE Horizons protagonist-plot-resolution Ch.4 architecture cannot describe. HOR‑4.3 Demonstrate that experimental LIVE Horizons narrative requires extra Ch.4 structural resources beyond the chapter’s apparatus.
KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑4.4 Structural-truth is not readable LIVE Horizons even as mixed, local, or Ch.4 resolution-relative.
HOR‑4.5 Show that consistent LIVE Horizons application of the structural- Ch.4 truth criterion produces censorship recommendations.
Chapter 5 — Language and the Compression of Records KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑5.1 The compression-token account LIVE Horizons Ch.5 fails for non-referring language.
HOR‑5.2 The joint-pattern account LIVE Horizons Ch.5 collapses into private-language paradoxes.
HOR‑5.3 A linguistic phenomenon is not LIVE Horizons Ch.5 reducible to compression- token, composition, joint- structure activation, context- selec…. HOR‑5.4 Context-dependence requires a LIVE Horizons Ch.5 context-semantics extra to the chapter’s account.
HOR‑5.5 A linguistic tradition exists LIVE Horizons Ch.5 where the compression-plus- joint-pattern account fails.
Chapter 6 — The Operator Without a Narrator KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑6.1 The operator-narrator LIVE Horizons Ch.6 distinction fails at one altered state.
HOR‑6.2 Narrator quiescence is never LIVE Horizons Ch.6 structurally clean.
KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑6.3 The structural-relief framing LIVE Horizons Ch.6 produces clinical distress that the framing itself worsens.
HOR‑6.4 Produce a phenomenon — LIVE Horizons Ch.6 blindsight, alien-hand syndrome, depersonalisation, dissociative states — that the operator-na….
HOR‑6.5 The structural-relief framing is LIVE Horizons Ch.6 rhetorical.
Chapter 7 — Animals and the Variable Narrator KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑7.1 The interior-sharing claim LIVE Horizons Ch.7 collapses at minimal-resolution coupling-architectures.
HOR‑7.2 Narrator-depth variation across LIVE Horizons Ch.7 species cannot be measured structurally.
HOR‑7.3 Proportional obligation LIVE Horizons Ch.7 produces internally inconsistent verdicts.
HOR‑7.4 Produce a non-human LIVE Horizons Ch.7 architecture the framework cannot handle.
HOR‑7.5 One-interior proves to be LIVE Horizons Ch.7 category-plural rather than resolution-variable.
Chapter 8 — The Problem of Transcendence KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑8.1 A recognised transcendent type LIVE Horizons cannot be read through Ch.8 operator/narrator reconfiguration.
KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑8.2 One-interior registration cannot LIVE Horizons be distinguished from Ch.8 pathological dissolution.
HOR‑8.3 A documented report requires LIVE Horizons extra-structural commitments at Ch.8 the load-bearing level. HOR‑8.4 Structural registration leads to LIVE Horizons destabilising outcomes that the Ch.8 framework cannot anticipate.
HOR‑8.5 One-interior cannot be LIVE Horizons distinguished from a tradition- Ch.8 specific nondual doctrine.
Chapter 9 — The Ethics of Cosmic Expansion KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑9.1 Pre-agency biosphere priority LIVE Horizons Ch.9 cannot resolve competing corridor claims.
HOR‑9.2 Terraforming cannot be audited LIVE Horizons Ch.9 at speculative timescales.
HOR‑9.3 Obligation-to-future- LIVE Horizons Ch.9 generations exhibits a form that window-extension cannot capture. HOR‑9.4 The 420 Code’s axiom forces a LIVE Horizons Ch.9 discount-rate structure on future obligations that is unjustified.
HOR‑9.5 Cosmic one-interior reduces LIVE Horizons Ch.9 without remainder to cosmopolitan ethics.
Chapter 10 — The Multiverse and the Singular Actualization State KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑10.1 The single-commitment reading LIVE Horizons of quantum measurement does Ch.10 not survive experimentally. HOR‑10.2 The loop cosmology is LIVE Horizons indistinguishable from a Ch.10 bubble-universe multiverse.
HOR‑10.3 A physical phenomenon exists LIVE Horizons that the loop cosmology cannot Ch.10 accommodate.
HOR‑10.4 An alternative single- LIVE Horizons commitment reading exists that Ch.10 the axiom does not privilege over the chapter’s reading.
HOR‑10.5 The defragmentation-to-break LIVE Horizons cycle requires premises outside Ch.10 the axiom’s structural conditions. HOR‑10.6 The axiom is consistent with a LIVE Horizons many-worlds reading. Ch.10
Chapter 11 — Eschatology Without Religion KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑11.1 The finite holding limit is LIVE Horizons assumed rather than derived. Ch.11
HOR‑11.2 Restoration-is-condition-for- LIVE Horizons break is not rigorous. Ch.11
HOR‑11.3 Empirical predictions LIVE Horizons distinguishable from CCC, Ch.11 Steinhardt-Turok, or another cyclic alternative are exhibited that th….
HOR‑11.4 A cosmological scenario exists LIVE Horizons that the loop cannot Ch.11 accommodate.
KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑11.5 The defragmented-grain-as- LIVE Horizons probability-weights claim is Ch.11 ungrounded.
Chapter 12 — The Sacred Without the Supernatural KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑12.1 Registration of one-interior is LIVE Horizons not distinguishable from Ch.12 numinous feeling.
HOR‑12.2 The relocation does not LIVE Horizons preserve phenomenological Ch.12 weight.
HOR‑12.3 A sacred experience exists that LIVE Horizons the framework cannot ground. Ch.12
HOR‑12.4 A structural ground for LIVE Horizons sacredness exists that does not Ch.12 reduce to the chapter’s claims.
HOR‑12.5 The sacred cannot survive Ø LIVE Horizons Resolutions Chapter 12’s Ch.12 confrontation without becoming consolation.
HOR‑12.6 The chapter fails to integrate LIVE Horizons the four-doors quartet. Ch.12
Chapter 13 — A World Aligned with the Axiom KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑13.1 An AP cross-reference is wrong. LIVE Horizons Ch.13
HOR‑13.2 A consequence does not in fact LIVE Horizons follow from its named source. Ch.13
HOR‑13.3 The Architecture A vs LIVE Horizons Architecture B distinction is not Ch.13 structural.
KS ID Description Status Origin
HOR‑13.4 A class of human practice LIVE Horizons exists that the axiom-aligned Ch.13 world cannot accommodate.
HOR‑13.5 The chapter has slipped into LIVE Horizons vision rather than derivation. Ch.13
HOR‑13.6 The chapter’s closing line is not LIVE Horizons earned. Ch.13
Section III Summary 256 kill switches book-specific to the Ø Models series: 61 in Dissolutions (PZ-1.1 through PZ-12.5); 66 in Resolutions (RES-1.1 through RES-12.6 plus RES-8.5.1–5); 68 in Horizons (HOR-1.1 through HOR-13.6); 61 in Applications (APP-1.1 through APP-12.6). All 256 are LIVE — book-specific publication switches stating the falsifiable conditions under which each chapter’s projection fails. Plus 5 new physics switches contributed by Ø Predictions and registered in Section I under their originating Artist’s Proofs (AP30 for KS-30.4, KS-NPP.1, KS-NPP.2, KS-NPP.3; AP42 for KS-42.6) — these are counted in Section I, not in this Section III subtotal, to avoid doublecounting in the 420 Code total.
The 420 Code — Total 561 kill switches across The 420 Code, counted as distinct switches. Section I: 277 across 43 Artist’s Proofs (273 in v5.11 content plus KS- 31.9b, admitted in v5.12, KS-P.5, admitted in v5.13, and KS-D.4, admitted in v5.14, and KS-COUP.1, admitted in v5.23; v5.11’s stated “270” counted unique labels, silently merging the five collision-pair switches — v5.12 counts switches, the same basis every bound notebook already uses). Section II: 28 across the Five Doors standalone volumes (Antichristos 7, The Relationship Corridor 11, The Interior 1, Being After Religion 9, The Illusion of the Other 0). Section III: 256 across the Ø Models series (Dissolutions 61, Resolutions 66, Horizons 68, Applications 61; Ø Predictions’ five new switches are registered in Section I under AP30 and AP42 and are not double-counted here). By notebook, Section I distributes: I — 36 · II — 24 · III — 31 · IV — 41 · V — 15 · VI — 37 · VII — 31 · VIII — 62. 12 closed. 1 conditionally closed. 2 addressed. 1 derived. 545 live — of which 4 open debt (KS-60, KS-65, KS-66, KS-67), 6 non- negotiable (KS-32.7, KS-33.7, KS-33.8, KS-33.9, KS-38.6, KS-39.6), 1 superseded as value (KS-R.6), 1 master (KS-AC.6 in Antichristos). 12 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 545 = 561. Every claim is stated. Every kill switch is published. Every experiment is specified.
Don’t be a cunt. Be kind.
the420code.org
